<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boost libraries making their way into mainstream openSUSE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freetechie.com/blog/boost-libraries-making-their-way-into-mainstream-opensuse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freetechie.com/blog/boost-libraries-making-their-way-into-mainstream-opensuse/</link>
	<description>In the world of linux your boundaries are free</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 17:18:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben.kevan</title>
		<link>http://www.freetechie.com/blog/boost-libraries-making-their-way-into-mainstream-opensuse/comment-page-1/#comment-7415</link>
		<dc:creator>ben.kevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benkevan.com/blog/?p=203#comment-7415</guid>
		<description>Hi Pascal, 

I know boost was included but now it seems a bunch of the other apps are being installed by default, and not just boost itself. 

Is suse going the route of using boost libs for other apps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pascal, </p>
<p>I know boost was included but now it seems a bunch of the other apps are being installed by default, and not just boost itself. </p>
<p>Is suse going the route of using boost libs for other apps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal Bleser</title>
		<link>http://www.freetechie.com/blog/boost-libraries-making-their-way-into-mainstream-opensuse/comment-page-1/#comment-7413</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal Bleser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benkevan.com/blog/?p=203#comment-7413</guid>
		<description>Boost libraries have always been included. Note that they&#039;re mostly included because they&#039;re a dependency to other packages (or, put another way, they&#039;re needed to build other libraries and applications).
There&#039;s no &quot;hush hush&quot;.
- 11.0 has boost-devel-1.34.1-34.i586.rpm
- 10.3 has boost-devel-1.33.1-108.i586.rpm
etc...

There won&#039;t be an upgrade to 1.37 for 11.1, as we&#039;re already in beta phase (which means feature freeze). Only bugfixes are applied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boost libraries have always been included. Note that they&#8217;re mostly included because they&#8217;re a dependency to other packages (or, put another way, they&#8217;re needed to build other libraries and applications).<br />
There&#8217;s no &#8220;hush hush&#8221;.<br />
- 11.0 has boost-devel-1.34.1-34.i586.rpm<br />
- 10.3 has boost-devel-1.33.1-108.i586.rpm<br />
etc&#8230;</p>
<p>There won&#8217;t be an upgrade to 1.37 for 11.1, as we&#8217;re already in beta phase (which means feature freeze). Only bugfixes are applied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

