<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome Unstable Build 3.0.191.3 released openSUSE Packages here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freetechie.com/blog/google-chrome-unstable-build-3-0-191-3-released-opensuse-packages-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freetechie.com/blog/google-chrome-unstable-build-3-0-191-3-released-opensuse-packages-here/</link>
	<description>In the world of linux your boundaries are free</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:47:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ben.kevan</title>
		<link>http://www.freetechie.com/blog/google-chrome-unstable-build-3-0-191-3-released-opensuse-packages-here/comment-page-1/#comment-8356</link>
		<dc:creator>ben.kevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benkevan.com/blog/?p=637#comment-8356</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-8351&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@David Herman &lt;/a&gt; 

David.. I re-uploaded the 64-Bit version.. my original upload seemed to be bad.. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-8351" rel="nofollow">@David Herman </a> </p>
<p>David.. I re-uploaded the 64-Bit version.. my original upload seemed to be bad.. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oleg</title>
		<link>http://www.freetechie.com/blog/google-chrome-unstable-build-3-0-191-3-released-opensuse-packages-here/comment-page-1/#comment-8355</link>
		<dc:creator>Oleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benkevan.com/blog/?p=637#comment-8355</guid>
		<description>Ben, 
What difference between 32bit and 64bit versions?
Both contain 32bit versions of executable file and libraries in lib32 (I look into previous 64bit build)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,<br />
What difference between 32bit and 64bit versions?<br />
Both contain 32bit versions of executable file and libraries in lib32 (I look into previous 64bit build)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jörg</title>
		<link>http://www.freetechie.com/blog/google-chrome-unstable-build-3-0-191-3-released-opensuse-packages-here/comment-page-1/#comment-8354</link>
		<dc:creator>Jörg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benkevan.com/blog/?p=637#comment-8354</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-8353&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Jörg &lt;/a&gt; 
OK I got it. I didn&#039;t see the rpm command, and if I change it to the following then it does work:

sudo rpm -Uvh --nodeps google-chrome-unstable-3.0.191.3-1.i386.rpm

(The --nodeps option needs two &quot;-&quot;, and it needs to be in front of the rpm file argument)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-8353" rel="nofollow">@Jörg </a><br />
OK I got it. I didn&#8217;t see the rpm command, and if I change it to the following then it does work:</p>
<p>sudo rpm -Uvh &#8211;nodeps google-chrome-unstable-3.0.191.3-1.i386.rpm</p>
<p>(The &#8211;nodeps option needs two &#8220;-&#8221;, and it needs to be in front of the rpm file argument)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jörg</title>
		<link>http://www.freetechie.com/blog/google-chrome-unstable-build-3-0-191-3-released-opensuse-packages-here/comment-page-1/#comment-8353</link>
		<dc:creator>Jörg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benkevan.com/blog/?p=637#comment-8353</guid>
		<description>YaST tells me about unresolved dependencies libnspr4.so.0d, libnss3.so.1d, libnssutil3.so.1.d, libplc4.so.0d, libplds4.so.0d, libsmime3.so.1d and libssl3.do.1d

Does anybody per chance know where to get these as RPMs, or how these dependencies could otherwise be resolved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YaST tells me about unresolved dependencies libnspr4.so.0d, libnss3.so.1d, libnssutil3.so.1.d, libplc4.so.0d, libplds4.so.0d, libsmime3.so.1d and libssl3.do.1d</p>
<p>Does anybody per chance know where to get these as RPMs, or how these dependencies could otherwise be resolved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oleg</title>
		<link>http://www.freetechie.com/blog/google-chrome-unstable-build-3-0-191-3-released-opensuse-packages-here/comment-page-1/#comment-8352</link>
		<dc:creator>Oleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benkevan.com/blog/?p=637#comment-8352</guid>
		<description>google-chrome-unstable-3.0.191.3-1.i386.rpm size 800k instead 12M

google-chrome-unstable-3.0.191.3-1.i386.rpm - 12950186
google-chrome-unstable-3.0.191.3-1.x86_64.rpm - 842896

ae83ffb0996f63503e3d441e27874580  google-chrome-unstable-3.0.191.3-1.i386.rpm
1d8b77c772e03b06c83ac4569843dacb  google-chrome-unstable-3.0.191.3-1.x86_64.rpm

Can you redeploy 64bit rpm?
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>google-chrome-unstable-3.0.191.3-1.i386.rpm size 800k instead 12M</p>
<p>google-chrome-unstable-3.0.191.3-1.i386.rpm &#8211; 12950186<br />
google-chrome-unstable-3.0.191.3-1.x86_64.rpm &#8211; 842896</p>
<p>ae83ffb0996f63503e3d441e27874580  google-chrome-unstable-3.0.191.3-1.i386.rpm<br />
1d8b77c772e03b06c83ac4569843dacb  google-chrome-unstable-3.0.191.3-1.x86_64.rpm</p>
<p>Can you redeploy 64bit rpm?<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Herman</title>
		<link>http://www.freetechie.com/blog/google-chrome-unstable-build-3-0-191-3-released-opensuse-packages-here/comment-page-1/#comment-8351</link>
		<dc:creator>David Herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benkevan.com/blog/?p=637#comment-8351</guid>
		<description>Thanks for making these available. Think there is a problem w/ the 64 bit version though.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for making these available. Think there is a problem w/ the 64 bit version though.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
